Information of Denmark

Some deciding principles for the rules of a constitution

The rules of the Constitution are the only protection of the citizens from the politicians in a so-called democracy. Therefore the Constitution is the foundation of the life of the nation. No constitution without nation, and no nation without constitution within the termes of democracy.

If the civil rights in the constitution are formulated positively, you will notice that the subjects that are not included, in reality is excluded from the total collection of rights, and it is possible by prohibitions and by orders to ignore natural right without any problems.
The rights in constitution have to be inalienable rights. That is of vital importance.

An example: Every individual is allowed to defend himself effectively, when his life is in danger.
Another example: No law that forbids an individual to defend himself effectively, when his life is in danger, can pass Congress.

There is a difference, I hope you see.

The rules in the constitution must not be formed as the promises of the rulers to the citizens, and those rights that have been given by God or Providence (if you wish so) (Natural Right) the constitution shall not deal with at all. If it does so, the rulers make themselves to gods. They certainly are not.

Nearly all the so-called founding rights in the foundation of EU fail here.

Take the EU-Social-Pact that passed december 1989. It was the first weak attempt to introduce constitutional rights in "Euroland". 12 EU-member-states (minus Great Britain, but later on Great Britain also accepted) signed EU-rights of the following types:

The right to free mobility of the citizens, the right to employment and wage-payment, the right to better living- and working-conditions, equal rights for men and women. And I could continue with their "most beautiful intentions".

This initiative was an infamy. No rights have been given. False marketing I would say. The rule-makers and the signers made themselves effected creations by this.

In Denmark the initiative of the rulers and TV to alter our constitution is being stronger and stronger. The initiative has primery been taken by some of the members of our parlament – Folketinget. They want to give the so-called human rights a jurisdiction including the whole world, and especially take away the rights of the citizens hand it over to the institutions of EU to get rid of our nation as soon as possible.

When e.g. the unpersonal humanity is financed by the state or by other taxfinanced autorities (as it is for 99.9 p.c.),and it is whipped up well in the electronic, state- and ideology-ruled media and the press to Exhibitionistic Humanity, the result is blunted hypocricy. When you try to rule the world as if you are the originator of the faith, the faith shall get rid of you, soon or later.

In Denmark we ought to copy central German Post War rules for the emission of money, make rules of maximum total government (state and local) spending as a percentage of a (in Denmark) corrected national income, decide well-founded true rights of liberty and a well-ordered anti-trust law, but perhaps we have to find King Valdemar Sejr's Jydske Law of 1241, and make it up to date, also in unquestionable respect of the relation to the fourth power - the media. It is deciding to see the truth that so-called Humanism financed by the state like all isms is our enemy. Humanism is a "wonderful word", but it means believing in the human being, founded in The Age Of Enlightment in the 18th Century, and in reality directly leading to The French Revolution). This aspect was certainly not taken proper into account in the American Constitution. The British Magna Charta is founded on the sepation of The Kingdom Of The Emperor and The Kingdom Of God (representing Natural Right if you wish). Petition of Right and Declaration of Right lay down rights as an independent, historical heritage.. Following Edmund Burk in his book 'Reflections On The Revolution Of France', 1790 - that's where it ends, if we allow the politically correct elite to continue - you will find a much more solid and right basic.

Not long ago Bill Clinton mentioned that islam and his own puritanical Christianity have so much in common.

Don’t laugh! I am afraid he was tiny bit right this time - but I have no reason to include Clinton's own puritanity. The other thing, think it over.

Martin Luther "was almost as clever", but he said: Man as a sinner are salved by mercy of God alone, not by something in itself. This principle is definitely not stupid, the Christians would say. Other would still call it some kind of "monopoly-entrance" to God. I would say that is not as sinister as the NWO-plan in all its terror anyway.
Our ancestors would have wanted something better for us than our so-called democratic but just politically correct power administrators finally are organizing right now.

A Swedish report on the newest perspective of EU

If your heart is filled use your brain