I, an opponent of the public lies, made a charge-budget like those which sometimes are used in the public health sector, when the amount of yield and the charge have to be accounted in lack of a better foundation. This charge-budget is based on the information about anything what so ever from the authorities, and then it is placed together with the greatest care. Unfortunately the account of the immigration-policy is 10 times larger, than those permissions of the state that were shown to the public till 1993. Now the lie can not be used any longer. This certainly does not mean that the truth then is accepted, and presented by the authorized who's duty it is to make a honest budget, and to inform truthfully. For the time being you just seek to hold a lower profile - as it is called in the language of signalizing - the critics must be effective prevented then from access to the media. That is very easy.

Carefully and very simple accountings show that more than the half of what the Dane is paying in personal income tax is used for interest payments on a debt that the Dane has not contracted, or it is used on the foreigners in Denmark. 74 p.c. - perhaps 79 p.c. - of the immigrants are on social security/welfare - the authorities mention the figure 40 p.c., but they forget the receivers of social welfare. These are the real figures i the period 1995-1997. We cannot reach the true result further. Without proper information it is were difficult. In 2000 84 p.c. of the foreigners are living on public welfare. We had to clean the statement for camouflage. Included in the 74 p.c. are children less 18 years and people in retirement not counted in . They just told that I am a racist. I am not. In 1998 our Minister of Economy maintain that the foreigners had a much small part of their group in the which they supply themselves at the labor market. We asked if the other received

any social security. They did not answered. But OECD had to correct our Minister of Economy, and media then told that the foreigners were 3½ times more unemployed than the Danes.

Jyllandsposten, September 10th 1999

extract:

30 p.c. of the group which receive social security are immigrants. While the Danish unemployed is offered work, more of the immigrant are becoming receivers of social security. The municipalities have to develop more targetoriented offers, says socialminister Karen Jespersen.

That was one of the central statements in the article

* * *

Lecture of Danish immigrationseconomy

In the extraction of the article mentioned above we will concentrate on:

Can this information be explaned better?

If 1th and/or 2th were not actual, the 6 p.c. foreigners living in Denmark would also have 6 p.c.. of all social security klients. You may say that these 6 p.c. are receivers of longterm social security, as if they made up 30 p.c. of the population.

In 1993 a corresponding official picture was drawn :

Information of the foreigner's load on number posts can required from Department of Social Security. One of its investigations shows that 87 p.c. of the refugies remain lasting klient of social security, and among the rest 13 p.c. a great number is trying to take an public financed education, if they do not receive another category of public subvention. An accounting from the town Aarhus also shows that the expenses concerning refugies receiving social security have been doubled in a period of five years, and in 1993 these expenses amounted 19 p.c. of the total sum of expenditures spend on social security (cf.The Weekly Newsletter Monday Morning no. 4/1993).

This information is of another type. Now you are concentrating on the share of indiduals in the group of receivers of social security. You are contrating on the share of the total expenditures.

About the same time the media informed that the 6 p.c that was the share of the foreigners made up then (officially) in Aarhus, received 30 p.c. of the social security. But notice that this problem is not necessarily the same as the mentioned in the extract of the article above.

If it had been this this information the Minister of Social Security had given about Denmark another element of explanation should have been added:

If we concentrate on the possible explanations 1, 2 og 3, and at the same time we take the total public expenditures, it is possible to make a rough estimate, and draw a picture of the load of the foreigners. (The responsibles could have used the citizennumber, but they refused.) Here you have to remember that the expenditures include not only the payment, but also the expenditures concerning service by civilian servants. We are so lucky that we have such an account called the functional distribution of public expenditures of the nation. Repayment and reimbursement of payment do not disturbe the account.

It has the be underlined that the mentioned 6 p.c. (1999) immigrants refered by the minister do match with the corrected account made by IoD. The naturalized and their children have to be included among others. The article did not succed with defining a Danish refering to our Constitution.

The share of immigrants is not smaller than 10 p.c. in Denmark (1999), possibly a great deal larger.

You get back by closing when you finished your reading.

in Danish version, only.

You get back by closing when you finished your reading.

By the accounting of the foreigners load you have account not just the cost which directly can connected to the target group. They are a burden on all entries like the Danish with a few exceptions.

It the special cost that means all the costs which would not had been without the immigrants. Earlier

we have seen calculation of burdens of the students, the our older citizens and the children. The loadbudget have also been used within the hospital service. Share of the target group, frequency, resourceburden is central concepts here.

If the target group amonts 12 p.c. and ressource burden is 1.75 while the frequency is the same (1), you get the proportional 12 p.c. multiplied with 1.75 or 21 p.c.

The target group may well amount to 18 p.c. even though the the whole group only amount to 10 p.c.

Immigrant have a much larger share of the group of children, for example.

In October 1998 Aarhus Town Counsel informed that 2 third of all swindle with social security were connected to immigrants. This means 67 p.c. of the swindle was done by 10 p.c. of the citizens. This means the burden is 6.7. If the immigrant receive social security 4 times as frequent as the Danish you can make conclusion: The immigrant do this crime with frequency of 1.7 (67/40) in relation to the Danish

In this way we will continue through all entries on the public budget.

The expenditures above have defrayed all in all. Now we shal try to estimate, how many of these expenditures which are caused by the immigrants. Of the 52 entries of the functional distribution we could take out one single in the year 1998:

Safety service: 197.826 mio kr. It has got italic and accentuated in the table from Danmark's Statistics.

If we assume that the foreigners receive the same payment in average as the Danish the result following the socialminister and the information from Danmark's Statistics.... (but take good care, the entries in the functionel distribution are specified alike in the Ten Years Review every year that secure the camouflage):

0.30 * 197.826 mio kr.= 59.347,8 mio kr eller 59,3 mia. kr. or should we use another percent than 30 p.c. You also have to remember that the foreigners do not a very large share of the group in ages of the pensioners.

The minister of economy hav had to admit that foreigners are 3½ times as often unemployed than the Danish in average. Do I then calculate (with 6 p.c.?) 3½ * 0.06 * 71.196 mio. kr. = 15 mia. or should I rather calculate 3½ * 0.10 * 71.196 mio. kr. =24.9 billions?

The unemployment is also accounted and presented in very mislesding way in Denmark.

Click back, when you can read enough.

The rest of entries could be treated in the same way with judisious consideration of relevance, invariability according to the receivers, to groupshare, frequence and ressourceload for both Danish and immigrants.

For example we know that foreigners are represented 3 times as often in the prisons than according to their share of the population. At worst places in the prisons 30-40 p.c. a immigrants.

This means 3*0.06, when we use immigrantshare chosen by the socialminister. If you would like check

these '3 times' click here:

Click back, when you have read enough..

If the burden – related to the resources – is also larger when account for a immigrant you have to take this into your account too.

In Aarhus they used 1,75 times more on children of the immigrants (ch. the public budget in kindergartens 1989)

If we assume that just something like this applyes to the prisons, in the police and in the rest of the juridical system the share of the expenditures will be: 1.75*3*0.06 = 31.5 p.c. Or should I rather calculate: 1.75**3*0.10 = 52.5 p.c.

If doubt that there is used so much energy on the foreigners i juridical system, you click:

Click back, when You have read enough.

Shall say 10,957 mio. kr * 0.315= 3.45 billion dkr. or rather 52.5% * 10,597 mio.kr.

You will perhaps subtract the taxpayment of the immigrant. That is fine if we just know what we are talking about. 84 p.c. of the immigrant are unemployed.

The authorities in Denmark told us in 1995 that the load was 10.3 billions dkr, and fameous Børsens Nyhedsmagasin told us that we earn a lot of money by having them here.

One of socalled critical parties in our parliament calculated the result to 30 billions dkr. Let us take the last mentioned sum.

30 billions is less than 5 p.c. of the total budget (cf. above). The share of the immigrants are officially in 1999 7.4 p.c. This mean that the Danish is much more expensive to the state. But this is not true. You have just learn that the immigrants are 3½ times more unemployed and 3 times more in prison.

Ergo, it is another camouflagelie.

In period 19931998 the publuc expenditures increased by more than 100 billions. Ask a Danish if he agree with you, when you maintain that Danish in same period have got so much more service and necessary care.

But take good care, yourself, when you ask!