Information of Denmark
Causal-interpretation nearly left – except when it fit into the ideology
that
is politically correct
The big jump in the
economic and political science of society happens at the transition from the
phase, where you can or can not explain and foresee the behavior of the human
being to the managed influence on behavior, watching and control. The
corresponding model of the explanation and forecasting of the human being
suites the underlying so-called empirism later on positivism, which
model-apparatus uses the model of causal-interpretation that needs the past to
explain the presence and the future. The experience, the past and also the
cause are not acknowledged, and this is perhaps quite legitimately to maintain,
when models show themselves not to apply to the outside world, even if you have
made an effort with all possible interpretations, especially those in symbols
of mathematical language.
And it is of special
interest, when we for a moment concentrate our thinking a little on just
another circle of subjects - which has not been discussed anywhere else in this
critical light:
Environment,
ecology, stratosphere, menaces to the globe, effects on heath, influence of
individual behavior in this connection and the correlation including the
influence of businesses on the surroundings and the commissioner's influence of
behavior on the producer. Taken in a random order, which is the custom in this
subjects.
In the treatment of these
subjects it is fully correct to show "coherence including causality"
between this and that. This is often done by using the so-called statistical,
quantitative methods.
They use
phenomenons that can be described using figures. I can assure the reader that
two of the used methods, Regression and the Chi-test among others have been used many times to obtain the wanted
coherence or the wanted causality from the model. Statistical method of
analysis, behind the most 'so-called investigations', which is shown to the
reader very often on TV as a report, an examination or the like. They all show
that something-must-be-done or
problem-reaction-solution.
The methods
are very fine mathematics, but when you use them, it is very easy to 1. Interpret the problem wrong, 2. To
choose a nonsense-coherence or, 3. To
select the wrong method, 4. To use
the methods wrong, 5. Interpret the results from the model wrong, 6. To make
a wrong conclusion on the basis of the results of model and transmit these
results to be results of the real world. Finally
you can give the material to an unsuspecting, but "very
understanding" journalist at a powerful medium. As you perhaps might
understand, there are several possibilities and especially a lot of
impossibilities.
One of these is (read 1.
above):
Because two
phenomenons appear at the same time, there do not have to light a clear and
imperative coherence between them. If for example the number of couples of
storks in Denmark in the summertime has increased from 12 to 25 couples in the
last two years, this is not a sure indicator of a so-called boom of babies
among the Danes. "Babies are comming
with the stork", small Danish children were told earlier. In the beginning
of the 1990s the Danish authorities informed about a boom of Danish babies,
although the Danish did not seem to give birth to more children. The number of
babies beared by foreigners or their children could be 20,000-25,000 a year -
you can not see how many - out of a birth-number of totally about 70.000 a
year. It should be mentioned in this connection that the Danish made - and
still do - between 17. 000 and 19. 000 abortions a year in the beginning of the
1990s.
On these
stratetic subjects, the fear of the unknown, of the distant, of the
unchallenged till now, for the unexamined, where refined methods of measuring
often effect the observation, very much can be shown and very much can not be
refused - on the other hand to prove is
something else. There are plenty of current phenomenons, plenty to
undertake.
Environment, illness,
health and the contributions in these connections. And then the career.
The
environment-ecology-consciousness (do not read knowledge) is already profound
and solid incorporated in marketing, pedagoy….everything. Perhaps with Al Gore
as the next American President from 2001 we shall see the world turn into an
environment dictatorship.
The paradox
and dilemma of the prevention – the claimed effect appear in the long run, and
it is difficult to reject the effect of prevention a priori – will surely be
used the with most explosive effects in the mind of the individuals of the
masses.
It is
interesting that the cause very easy can be used here, even though equivalence, unambiguity, func-tionality,
really are serious scientific problems, which often are overlooked, even though
these problems are rather determining.
You have to
understand: The end justifies the means - especially for many ambiguities ones
among the 'The Jesuits of the Time' for the salvation of the world. This was
just a little disgression, but not without importance.
A total
statement about this theme ought to have a reading of its own.
If the fourth power or wave (after or at the
same time as the third power) should
not be found exactly around these new so-called "scientific-like
causal-shows", I should wonder a great deal. The witchcraft at least can
contribute to, what David Icke call the "Something-Have-To-Be-Done-Effect", which
precisely matches Hegel's Tese-Antitese-Syntese
planning-model.
It can happen at the same time that essential facts are totally overlooked - the cause can be used, when needed to reach the politically correct effects.
An example
from Denmark is The Water Environment Plan. Price 17 Mia. DKr. Several facts
were completely overlooked in spite of the fact that you could have learnt in
Holland, and could have learnt a little more inorganic chemistry too. This was
shown in Jyllands-Posten by our famous patriot from World War II Flemming Juncker.
From
causal-models the transition first went towards the philosophical
society-thinkers. They describe, interpret and seek understanding. With this
starting point causal-models are getting insufficient, because the personality
can not objectively analyzed. This has been
shown already by the philosopher Emanuel Kant.
The theory
of behavior is powerful, generally also in the Danish (economic) HD-education,
and first-rate men lead the arrangement, the lectures, the problems, the
seminars and the examination. One of these Professor Flemming Hansen wrote
publicly – under the third wave -
November 21st 1989 and November 6th 1992 that 15 millions ought to live
in Denmark. Of these 15 millions - we have near 5,3 millions inhabitants for
the moment on our 43,850 square-kilometers - only half of them need to be
individuals which have been born in Denmark.
The number
of professors of this kind is increasing all the time.
Let me
quess, the fourth wave is the environment
used in a political correct way on the minds of the first-rate men and
women.
But
power is not just what you fill into the mind of the individuals