I know the ethnic fertility is perhaps not
accounted for in your country, but sooner or later it will be much easier to
tell the truth. It is also easier not to have to take especially good care
every single time you mention the subject in a special neutral formulation:
“Women in Germany” “Frauen in
Grossbritannien“
According to: www.globalenvision.org/library/8/874
The Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy,
Poland, the Russian Federation, Spain and Ukraine have fertility levels
now closer to one child per woman. Here the fertility level
refers to the ethnic fertility.
|
Country/source |
Eurostat/2004 Total fertility |
Calculated 1) Ethnic fertility |
|
Spain |
1,26 |
1,04 |
|
Spain ”off.”
earlier |
1,14 |
|
|
France |
1,90 |
|
|
Denmark |
1,78 |
1,21 |
|
Sweden |
1,75 |
|
|
Germany |
1,36 |
1,07 |
|
Holland |
1,73 |
|
|
Belgium |
1,64 |
|
|
Luxembourg |
1,71 |
|
|
Austria |
1,42 |
|
|
Italy |
1,33 |
0,95 |
|
Greece |
1,29 |
0,99 |
|
Portugal |
1,47 |
|
|
Great Britain |
1,74 |
|
|
Finland |
1,80 |
|
|
25 EU-countries |
1,49 |
|
|
15 old EU-countries |
1,46 |
1,08 |
Source to total fertility:
Eurostat: http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AF-05-001/EN/KS-AF-05-001-EN.PDF page 16
1) Calculation of
ethnic fertility in some European countries:
When we add the number of immigrants from areas
outside Western Europe, North America, Israel, Japan, Australia and New Zealand
included the naturalized and their children to the official accounted number of
in this category 1 January 2006, we get a smaller number than reality, because
the naturalized earlier than 1979 and their descendants are not included in the
account from www.dst.dk ,
Databanken.
Even though the calculated number is more than
the doubled of the official number in Denmark: http://www.lilliput-information.com/uscan.html
The reasons to
include the naturalized and descendants:
When we look at
different events in community it seems as if the so-called
integration-activities do not make much impacts. The public authorities in
Denmark have admitted recently:
Second and third
generation of immigrants or the descendants commit an even much greater share
of the crime acts according to their respectively shares of the population
(this account is even partly affected by the false official population account
that ironically leads to an overestimatimated criminality of the immgrants and
their descendants).
Second and third
generation have an even weaker connection to the labour market than their
parents.
Second and third
generation gave birth to 10 p.c. more children a woman i Copenhagen over a five
year period than their parents.
In average all
immigrants from less developed countries load the public sector three times as
much compared with the Danes (according to the newly report from the Danish welfare
Commission), and the second and third generation load the public sector even
heavier.
The number of
immigrants from the selected area is the only number that has been growing -
even accelerating and also exponential growing in periods - for all the last 25 year.
Long before the public authorities admitted
this, it had been shown from almost every angel, including unemployment, public
consumption, criminality and from an indirect correction of the official
Danish demographic account. The last mentioned official account is being
critized right now by researchers at the Danish Universities too.
We know from official population accounts that
the foreign immigrants have percentage in fertile ages of 10-15 p.c. larger
than the Danish percentage in the this ages group (15-40 years).
If we assume that 18 p.c of the birth given
women in Europe are foreign immigrants, and that the foreigners give birth to
3(-3,5) child a woman in average, the total fertility can be calculated by a
weighed average in this way:
0,18*3 + 0,85*FEeu = 1,46 that implies FEeu = 1,08, where FEeu is the average
fertility in the 15 old EU-countries.
In Denmark the foreigners amount to 25 p.c. of
birth giving women and the
composition of the immigrants lead to an
average fertility among foreigners of at least 3,5 child. The same in Italy:
0,25*3,5 + 0,75*FEda = 1,78 that implies FEda =
1,21
0,15*3,5 + 0,85*FEit = 1,33 that implies
FEit = 0,95
Our future - of interest: http://www.lilliput-information.com/engeufolk.html
The consideration of even an increase of
the immigration to Europe has been evaluated in: http://www.lilliput-information.com/euarb.html
The German women gave birth to just 680,000 in 2995, perhaps corrected
to 578,000 when interpret the formulation correctly according to this reading.
The real number of births among Germans should have been about the double in
secure a stable German population, perhaps 1,056,000 corresponding to a
fertility of 2.14 instead the present 1.07 child a woman.
To increase the immigration in order to compensate for this lacking
amount of births leads automatically to Germans will become a minority twice as
fast, and the increased immigration even increases the expenditures for several
years in the sector which expenditures already have to be reduced substantial
in order make the businesses remain in Germany. When we hear them say they
want to stimulate qualified immigrants to come to Europe this time, we have
vainly asked from where they do intend to get those qualified immigrants.
The same forces operate in the leading circles around whole Europe. If
they want to get rid of the ethnic Europeans as quickly as possible, it should
not be a secret.